Waiting Well Programme

Concepts

• newcastle upon tyne
• health services
• waiting well programme
• well
• waiting
• health inequalities
• health
• psr direct award process c.
• psr direct award process c.
• wellbeing

Location

Newcastle-upon-Tyne

Description

Waiting Well Programme

Total Quantity or Scope

To test and produce evidence around new ways of working in health. Its focus is to promote changes in the health system that help those people most affected by health inequalities to better manage their health and wellbeing.This contract has been awarded under PSR Direct Award Process C. The approximate lifetime value of the contract is £74,872 . It is an 8-month contract. Service scheduled to commence on 1st January 2026 to 31st August 2026.

Award Detail

Award Criteria

CPV Codes

• 85100000 - Health services

Indicators

• Award on basis of price.

Legal Justification

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. The standstill period begins on 14th November 2025 and the standstill expires on 27th November 2025. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by the end of standstill.

Other Information

This contract has been awarded under PSR Direct Award Process C. The standstill will begin on 14th November 2025. The standstill period ends of 27th November 2025.The Contract Title & Reference is as follows:Waiting Well Programme - C401930The contract has been awarded to Ways to Wellness Limited2nd Floor Forth Banks HouseSkinnerburn RoadNewcastle Upon TyneNE1 3RHThe service falls under CPV 85100000 - Health ServicesThe lifetime of the contract will be 8 months.The provider was assessed against 5 key criteria: Quality and Innovation; Value; Integration, collaboration, and service sustainability; Improving access, reducing inequalities, and facilitating choice; and social value.Each criterion was assessed on a pass/fail basis, considering whether they have currently satisfied the criteria under the previous contract and whether they would likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard. The provider achieved a pass score against all criteria.No conflicts of interests were recorded.